Does the truth hurt less when the messenger looks like you?
How affinity bias impacts feedback sharing in your team
Photo: Moe Magners
Hi readers, Abadesi here. Hope this finds you well. This essay is part of a series I’m developing “Cultural Intelligence in Action”: a framework for leaders building high-functioning, healthy teams.
Who do you really listen to on your team? And who do you ignore?
Let’s start with a reflection: I want you to think about the last time someone gave you feedback that actually changed how you think or behave. Not the kind of feedback that you acknowledged politely but filed away.
Now think about who gave you that really actionable feedback.
I bet they were someone you related to. Someone whose judgment you already respected before they spoke. Someone whose cultural reference points overlap with yours.
I bet there have been other people - with different backgrounds - who gave you similar feedback. But that feedback, you heard differently. It felt slightly off.
The observations made may have been the same. How you received it was totally different.
This is how affinity bias impacts our sense of what is credible. Of who is credible. And it is one of the most quietly destructive forces in organisational culture.
Photo: Diva Plavalaguna
How affinity bias shows up in feedback
Affinity bias is often discussed in the context of hiring: we tend to hire people who remind us of ourselves.
But how does it show up in how we give and receive feedback in our teams?
Let’s say a leader, Leo, receives the same observation from two different colleagues, Mark and Mo.
Mark shares Leo’s educational background, cultural sensibility, and way of framing problems. For Leo, Mark’s feedback feels precise, well-considered, coming from a place of genuine understanding. Leo absorbs it.
Let’s say Mo doesn’t share those qualities with Leo. Mo comes from a different background, a different cultural context.
Mo’s feedback covers the same ground as Mark’s but it arrives in a slightly different register.
For Leo, it feels like it’s missing something. Like Mo doesn’t fully get the complexity. Leo listens to Mo, then files the data point away.
Leaders like Leo don’t think of this as biased behaviour. He believes it’s sensible to decide which feedback is really useful. Worth actioning.
But could Leo just be filtering feedback through his own cultural affinity? Could his quality control just be unconscious bias at work?
If so, over time, the colleagues whose perspectives Leo most needs, those whose different cultural intelligence gives them sight lines he doesn’t have, are systematically discounted.
How does this impact the colleagues sharing feedback with leadership?
Team mates like Mo who are on the receiving end of this pattern notice that their honest feedback is ignored or reframed. So they adapt.
Some of them start softening their feedback: translating it into a register they know will land better.
Others choose to stay quiet. The silence looks like disengagement. It’s actually self-preservation.
Both outcomes are costly to a team.
This can be solved through better Communication Infrastructure
When I map communication infrastructure in organisations, this is one of the patterns I look for. Not whether people give feedback, but whose feedback actually moves through the system and changes something.
The question to ask isn’t “Do we have a feedback culture?”
Most leaders answer yes to that. The harder questions to unpack are:
“Whose feedback counts as credible in this organisation?”
“Does that map onto who already has the most institutional influence and power?”
In most organisations I work with, it does. This isn’t usually intentional. It’s the natural output of a communication system that was never designed with cultural intelligence in mind.
Actions you can implement in your leadership from today
Stop conflating comfort with credibility:
Feedback that arrives in a familiar register, from someone whose background overlaps with yours, feels more credible because it’s more comfortable. That’s not the same thing.
Design feedback systems that don’t rely on a leader’s receptiveness as the main filter:
Try anonymous mechanisms or third-party listening sessions where people can speak without their words being immediately attributed and assessed.
Actively notice whose feedback you’ve been discounting:
Go back to them. Ask for advice again. Create the conditions where they might trust that this time, it’s safe to tell you the full story.
Cultural Intelligence in Action is a framework for leaders building organisations where team mates feel empowered to speak up and share observations that can positively impact stakeholders.
If this resonated I’d like to hear from you. Reply to this email or find me on LinkedIn.
Techish Podcast
Is on spring break. Catch re-runs, including a recording from our live show with Ryan Leslie, on YouTube.
Founder Masterclass
Check out Abadesi’s B2B Sales Masterclass on-demand for help on growing your business.
Free Resources
Want to get in touch?
Schedule a call with our founder & CEO Abadesi Osunsade here
Follow us on LinkedIn, Instagram, X (Twitter), YouTube